The Effects of Multilateral vs. Bilateral Aid on Recipient Behavioral Support
نویسندگان
چکیده
The literature on foreign assistance generally holds that multilateral aid is preferable to bilateral aid, but establishes this primarily through highly aggregated cross‐national time‐ series data. We investigate this topic experimentally from the perspective of those whom the foreign aid directly affects: recipient citizens. We thus report results of a survey exper‐ iment with behavioral outcomes on more than 3,000 Ugandan citizens. The findings pro‐ vide some evidence that multilateral aid is indeed preferable to bilateral aid, but the effect obtains only for some of our outcomes of interest. We disaggregate the data and compare preferences within the multilateral and bilateral categories and show evidence that aid from the U.S. government is preferred to aid from China for some outcomes.
منابع مشابه
On the Channel and Type of International Disaster Aid
Research suggests that a donor country’s decision to provide post-disaster assistance is not only driven by the severity of a disaster and the resulting humanitarian needs in the recipient country but also by strategic considerations. We argue that the identification of the determinants of the size of disaster assistance is a first step in the analysis of the donor’s behavior. Since all aid is ...
متن کاملThe choice for multilateralism: Foreign aid and American foreign policy
Why do governments choose multilateralism? We examine a principalagent model in which states trade some control over the policy for greater burden sharing. The theory generates observable hypotheses regarding the reasons for and the patterns of support and opposition to multilateralism. To focus our study, we analyze support for bilateral and multilateral foreign aid giving in the US. Using new...
متن کاملWhen is Foreign Aid Effective in Fighting Terrorism? Threshold Evidence
Building on previous literature, we assess when foreign aid is effective in fighting terrorism using quantile regressions on a panel of 78 developing countries for the period 1984-2008. Bilteral, multilateral and total aid indicators are used whereas terrorism includes: domestic, transnational, unclear and total terrorism dynamics. We consistently establish that foreign aid (bilateral, multilat...
متن کاملAre Bilateral and Multilateral Aid for Trade Complementary? Accounts from Africa
We examine the impact of aid for trade (AFT) on bilateral trade costs of African Nations. Using a comprehensive bilateral trade cost data from Arvis et al. (2013) and focusing on AFT recipients in Africa spanning the years 2002-2010, we show that increased AFT reduces bilateral trading costs, more so for the recipient’s trade with each other than recipients’ trade with their donors. Despite dif...
متن کاملSectoral Aid Priorities: Are Donors Really Doing Their Best to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals?
We analyze the aid portfolio of various bilateral and multilateral donors, testing whether they have prioritised aid in line with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In doing so, we combine sectorally disaggregated aid data with indicators reflecting the situation of recipient countries regarding the MDGs. Our results show that donors differ not only in terms of their overall generosity an...
متن کامل